WORD PROCESSING 2013 CODE OVER THE

Microsoft Word began life as Multi-Tool Word for Xenix in 1983. Daniel Knight - 2013.07.13. Microsoft Word for Mac FAQ.

There was an era before Microsoft Word's dominance when a variety of radically different paradigms for text preparation and formatting competed in an open marketplace of ideas. But what exactly is wrong with it?Microsoft Office, or simply Office, is a family of client software, server software, and services developed by Microsoft.It was first announced by Bill Gates on August 1, 1988, at COMDEX in Las Vegas.Initially a marketing term for an office suite (bundled set of productivity applications), the first version of Office contained Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, and Microsoft PowerPoint.I've been using word processors and text editors for nearly 30 years. Its pervasive near-monopoly status has brainwashed software developers to such an extent that few can imagine a word processing tool that exists as anything other than as a shallow imitation of the Redmond Behemoth. Worse: it is a near-monopolist, dominating the word processing field. It has been the dominant word processing program on the Mac since 1988 and on Windows since 1993.Word Processor For Mac free download - NJStar Chinese Word Processor, NJStar Japanese Word Processor, Apple Mac OS X Snow Leopard, and many more programsMicrosoft Word is a tyrant of the imagination, a petty, unimaginative, inconsistent dictator that is ill-suited to any creative writer's use.

Word Processing 2013 Code Over The

Programs like WordStar led the way, until WordPerfect took the market in the early 1980s by adding the ability to edit two or more files at the same time in a split screen view.Then, in the late 1970s and early 1980s, research groups at MIT and Xerox's Palo Alto Research Center began to develop the tools that fleshed out the graphical user interface of workstations like the Xerox Star and, later, the Apple Lisa and Macintosh (and finally the Johnny-come-lately imitator, Microsoft Windows). As the first 8-bit personal computers appeared (largely consisting of the Apple II and the rival CP/M ecosystem), programmers tried to develop a hybrid tool called a word processor: a screen-oriented editor that hid the complex and hostile printer control commands from the author, replacing them with visible highlight characters on screen and revealing them only when the user told the program to 'reveal codes'. Thank you James for this wonderful piece of code Over the years you made Bean one if not the best Word processor for OS.These tools were fast, powerful, elegant, and extremely demanding of the user.

One of his first jobs was to organize the first true WYSIWYG word processor for a personal computer - Microsoft Word for Macintosh. Steve Jobs approached Bill Gates to write applications for the new Macintosh system in 1984, and Bill agreed. In a style sheet system, units of text - words, or paragraphs - are tagged with a style name, which possesses a set of attributes which are applied to the text chunk when it's printed.Microsoft was a personal computer software company in the early 1980s, mostly notable for their BASIC interpreter and MS-DOS operating system. But another group wanted to use a far more powerful model: hierarchical style sheets. One faction wanted to take the classic embedded-codes model, and update it to a graphical bitmapped display: you would select a section of text and mark it as 'italic' or 'bold' and the word processor would embed the control codes in the file and, when the time came to print the file, it would change the font glyphs being sent to the printer at that point in the sequence.

Microsoft Word grew by acquiring new subsystems: mail merge, spelling checkers, grammar checkers, outline processing. If confronted with a successful new type of software, Microsoft would purchase one of the leading companies in the sector and then throw resources at integrating their product into Microsoft's own ecosystem, if necessary dumping it at below cost in order to drive rivals out of business. One of its tactics became known (and feared) throughout the industry: embrace and extend. Word was in fact broken by design, from the outset - and it only got worse from there.Over the late 1980s and early 1990s Microsoft grew into a behemoth with a near-monopoly position in the world of software. Even though they're fundamentally incompatible and you can get into a horrible mess by applying simple character formatting to a style-driven document, or vice versa.

Each new version of Word defaulted to writing a new format of file which could not be parsed by older copies of the program. But as Word's domination became established, Microsoft changed the file format repeatedly - with Word 95, Word 97, in 2000, and again in 2003 and more recently. Early versions of Word interoperated well with rivals such as Word Perfect, importing and exporting other programs' file formats. There is an entire graveyard of once-hopeful new software ecosystems, and its name is Microsoft Word.As the product grew, Microsoft deployed their embrace-and-extend tactic to force users to upgrade, locking them into Word, by changing the file format the program used on a regular basis. Microsoft killed the outline processor on Windows stalled development of the grammar checking tool, stifled spelling checkers. But one by one, Microsoft moved into each sector and built one of the competitors into Word, thereby killing the competition and stifling innovation.

Doc file you virtually have to write a mini-implementation of Microsoft Word. And 'fast save' made the picture worse, by appending a journal of changes to the application's in-memory state. Doc file format was also obfuscated, deliberately or intentionally: rather than a parseable document containing formatting and macro metadata, it was effectively a dump of the in-memory data structures used by word, with pointers to the subroutines that provided formatting or macro support. ' dialog, and so if you needed to work with others you had to pay the Microsoft Danegeld on a regular basis, even if none of the new features were any use to you.

And they expect me to integrate myself into a Word-centric workflow, even though it's an inappropriate, damaging, and laborious tool for the job. Doc files as their raw substrate, even though this is a file format ill-suited for editorial or typesetting chores. They have warped and corrupted their production workflow into using Microsoft Word. But somehow, the major publishers have been browbeaten into believing that Word is the sine qua non of document production systems. I use a variety of other tools, from Scrivener (a program designed for managing the structure and editing of large compound documents, which works in a manner analogous to a programmer's integrated development environment if Word were a basic text editor) to classic text editors such as Vim. I do not write novels using Microsoft Word.

I've been using Word regularly for twenty years now, and I tend to wind up becoming in charge of managing documentation in any office where I work by virtue of being the only one that can get documents to look consistent in Word. At no point was Microsoft Word involved in its creation and you can buy it as an ebook from all the usual stores, via the menu here.And even the gurus with job security hate it. And if you're interested in seeing what I write, my latest novella, 'Equoid', goes on sale tomorrow (October 16th). It has held us back for nearly 25 years already I hope we will find something better to take its place soon.PS: I write for a living. And worse, by its very prominence, we become blind to the possibility that our tools for document creation could be improved.

Word Processing For Mac 2013